Different definitions of art and photography

The first element of art that can be applied to any subject matter is texture. Texture Texture is pretty self-explanatory — finding things that have interesting textures and including them in your photograph. For portraits, a textured background such as a worn, rustic barn can make your subject stand out and give you an creative background.

Different definitions of art and photography

Commercial photographer, writer and photographic instructor The Line Between Art and Photography Here's a provocative question: Have a think about this carefully, for a moment.

Different Definitions of Art and Photography Essay – Free Papers and Essays Examples

Today I'm going to crack open the lid of one of the biggest cans of worms in the whole of photography, peer inside, give you my 1. Perhaps the biggest struggle photography has faced historically as a medium is to be taken seriously as an art form. I'd say it's only in the last couple of decades that the results at auction have been able to hold their own against traditional art forms; even if a good chunk of us don't understand why -- myself included.

I'm probably not the only one thinking of Andreas Gursky here. Yet we don't have photographs insured for hundreds of millions of dollars, or exhibited behind bulletproof glass, or even the subject of exciting art heists -- let alone Hollywood movies -- why is this?

Culprit number one in this has to be a combination of repeatability and access. By repeatability, I mean the ability to make exact copies of an image ad infinitum; simple laws of supply and demand dictate that the more objects there are to go around, the less fighting over them ensues -- and consequently, value falls.

Even with an old-fashioned hand-made print -- it's possible to make more than one identical -- or at least near-identical -- copy of the same image from the same negative, which instantly means it can't be as exclusive as a painting. Unless perhaps one destroys the negative or deletes the file after printing, I suppose.

Though master prints still fetch some considerable coin, as do negatives, I just can't see the same thing happening with digital files; right now, people pay for rights to use the images, but the file you download is identical to the file that's in the image library.

There is nothing stopping you - other than the law and your respect of it -- from making identical duplicates. I've always said the proliferation of digital photography is a good and bad thing; on one hand, talented people who wouldn't previously have given photography a try have done so, and all of us benefit from their work, as well as a general raising of visual standards; on the other hand, access for all has devalued the individual image.

I have to admit, I'm a little surprised by this; given that more people can now see just how difficult it is to achieve a given result, we'd expect that the ascribed value of an image should be closer to its intrinsic value now, right?

Abstract Expressionism

The opposite is true: And if I can take the same photo -- as far as I can tell, at any rate -- why bother paying for it? Blame it on the camera company marketers. In trying to push more gear to the mass markets at every-shrinking margins, they're indirectly killing the halo effect that sold their gear in the first place.

Sadly, former photographic greats like Hasselblad and Leica seem to be turning more into lifestyle brands than the makers of true tools for the artist. In recent times, there has been nothing more democratizing than the cameraphone: And to make it worse, the images that are widely shared and viewed - think of them as making it into the visual culture of society - are inevitably the ones that are the shoutiest, not the best.

Let's not even go into the effect of hipstagram and the like.

Different definitions of art and photography

Take the first image in this post, for instance: I didn't do anything special to promote it. Obviously, people find something aesthetically pleasing about the image; does it matter that it was shot on an iPhone? Other than limiting my ability to print it at very large sizes, I can't think of any reason why it should.

Suppose for a moment that somewhere down the line, the original file and EXIF got lost, a nice print came up at auction, and it sold for a good amount of money -- because it's a nice image. Then later on, horror of horrors, it comes to light that it was shot with a camera-phone.

MoMA | Glossary of Art Terms

Would it change the perception of its value? Just because it was made with inferior equipment somehow instantly also makes the composition inferior, just like how a 'pro' with old or small cameras is still viewed by most clients and the public as being second-rate.

Never mind the fact that it's much more difficult to take a good image with crap equipment in the first place. An interpretation of reality -- how I saw it in my mind, not necessarily how reality appeared to everybody else also present at the time.Definitions of "fine art photography" on photographers' static Web pages vary from "the subset of fine art that is created with a camera" to "limited-reproduction photography, using materials and techniques that will outlive the artist".

The arts refers to the theory and physical expression of creativity found in human societies and cultures. Major constituents of the arts include literature (including drama, poetry, and prose), performing arts (among them dance, music, and theatre), and visual arts (including architecture, ceramics, drawing, painting, photography, and sculpting).

Next Question of the Month

Bazin’s statement can go from valid, based on his definition of art, to invalid, based on Arnheim’s definition of art. Therefore the validity of this statement will .

Before presenting my ideas I should point out that they will reflect my biases, so please take them for what they are: an attempt to understand the concept of fine art photography and make you, the reader, think about these matters consciously. There are different types of photography, from fashion photography, wildlife photography, food photography to wedding photography and more.

Applied Art Applied art is a part of visual art and it can be defined as art that has practical application as well as functionality. Nov 18,  · The Line Between Art and Photography.

face a very different set of challenges to other artists: the main artistic one is dealing with the physical constraints of the real world, and the.

Art Definition: Meaning, Classification of Visual Arts